|
|
| Discussions for Gofish Corporation | View all discussions |
|
| Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover? | ||
| All 20 messages in discussion - | ||
From: ratu...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:34:19 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 5 2007 5:34 pm
Subject: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
A big OUCH for the GOFHers. The stock closed at $0.43 on Friday, with
an intra-day low of $0.30. Bad news for anybody still in. GOFH has gone from a $150 million market cap company in February to a $7 million market cap company on Friday. Well, we will see if the optimists are really prudent and The current credit crunch has profound implications for GOFH. Simply Even great growing tech firms like NTGR have seen their stock prices This company has big debt and no assets, and high expenses and low This is not a turn-around company. It is a company that appears The only real question in my mind is how much more time GOFH will limp You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: ratu...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 14:40:24 -0700
Local: Sun, Aug 5 2007 5:40 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
Just saw this in the Google news that I hadn't seen when writing
above: Gofish Corporation Terminates Plan To Acquire Bolt, Inc. More writing on the wall. Bolt was the one real revenue source they You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:50:45 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 6 2007 10:50 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
ratu: correct me if I am wrong, but your facts seem out of place in a
discussion of this company. #1 "Reasonable companies with real business models like American Home AHM was not a "reasonable" company. It was part of a serious fraud Furthermore, it was in the "money lending" business, and as such, its #2 "The price is so low that GOFH is ripe for a hostile takeover for Even though GOFH is publicly traded, I believe that there are You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: brooke.lo...@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:20:42 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 6 2007 11:20 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
Wow!!! GOFH is making it very difficult to remain in their corner.
Much of my own confidence in them was/ is as a result of my belief in Aaron Cohen as a solid executive. Ultimately, I'm hearing it came down to this: The record labels wanted far more money ( to settle Bolt copywrite litigation) than GOFH could pay. Initially, I believe they (record labels) were also going to get stock, but as the shares continued to plummet, this became far less acceptable form of payment for them. So the deal falls apart. Which means, Bolt is going to have to file bankruptcy, and possibly shut down. GOFH loses a golden opportunity to add some much needed revenue to the company's coffers. And, of course, shareholders are left holding the proverbial bag. The only good news, if you can call it that, is GOFH now has some cash It has taken them too long to close the Bolt deal, too long to Verjee, FIRE some people already. In fact, fire most of them. STOP As my past post clearly demonstrate, I'm a fan. But I'm no Kool-aid You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: ratu...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 18:10:45 -0700
Local: Fri, Aug 10 2007 9:10 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
> AHM was not a "reasonable" company. It was part of a serious fraud Certainly there were problems with the home mortgage industry, but > perpetrated against the American home buying public and played fast > and loose with consumer lending rules. It was a morally bankrupt > enterprise. your characterization seems unfair. A claim of fraud is a criminal allegation. I have seen no evidence of anything actionable, nor have I even heard word of investigation of such matters. I am not a fan of AHM, but I would say they are guilty of poor judgment, yes. Fraud, no. This seems to be the belief of the feds and most in the industry also. My comparison stands. Compared to GOFH, AHM at least had a real >GOFH does not have debt, only the "Notes". If there are Uuh...yeah. If you read through the agreement, the private "notes" > convenants in the notes that reflect a techncial default please > enlighten me. Those notes were created in May/June during the > "convenant lite" times. held against GOFH are pretty draconian. Full ratchet antidilution etc. The purchasers have the right to PUT notes back on GOFH. It's called debt. Not to mention the rate GOFH is burning through > Even though GOFH is publicly traded, I believe that there are Substantiation of claim, please. > sufficient inside holders that own a majority of shares, so a takeout > is not possible without explicit permission from the powers that be. Even if this were true, the question is: why isn't GOFH's board There is really only one possible reason for the lack of repurchase: You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jim.casagra...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:47:41 -0700
Local: Tues, Aug 14 2007 12:47 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
Rats fleeing the sinking ship - check sec.gov for the latest bad news
- selling shareholders offering millions more shares... This stock is going to zero. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:47:26 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 15 2007 4:47 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
jim.casagra...@gmail.com wrote: jim: I could be wrong, because the filing is very lengthly and > Rats fleeing the sinking ship - check sec.gov for the latest bad news > - selling shareholders offering millions more shares... > This stock is going to zero. convoluted, and I am only performing a perfunctory review. However, doesn't this appear to be just an orderly unwind of the notes? Essentially, the vast majority (or maybe all) of the noteholders are being "forced converted" to common stock [I'm sure with their consent] under the contractual provisions of the notes. What this does is eliminate all of the convenants, but in exchange for a massive dilution. Massive diluting a penny stock with no revenue is laughable. Ultimately, Jim, you may in fact be right (because I have no knowledge The damage was already done with the stock going from $5/$6 to $2, Do you see my point? chicago You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 14:12:21 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 15 2007 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
ratu...@gmail.com wrote: [edit] > Even if this were true, the question is: why isn't GOFH's board > authorizing a stock buyback for pennies on the dollar? Good companies > do this. Like MINI, whose board announced this week that they felt > that their stock was undervalued, so they are spending $50 million to > repurchase stock. Surely the current 32 cents/share would be a bargain > basement price for repurchasing if the stock had any future at all. Have you ever conducted a stock tender? > Even if the company remained stagnant, one could earn significant > money simply off of the volatility. > There is really only one possible reason for the lack of repurchase: The reason for no tender of the shares is 3 fold. #1 major stakeholders will not tender #2 the free trading shares are being held in retail accounts, which are small and difficult to contact - administrtive hassle with low probability of sucess #3 any material non-public information held by the Directors that would cause the stock to shoot upward would leave the company in position for a shareholder lawsuit. If the stock is trading at $0.36 and the company buys you out at $0.40, then they announce something later and the stock moves up to $0.75, don't you see the potential liability risk? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: brooke.lo...@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 17:01:46 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 16 2007 8:01 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: matt.so...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 02:45:38 -0000
Local: Thurs, Aug 16 2007 10:45 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
Anyone have any clue why their shares suddenly plummeted almost 30%
today after 1pm? Did some news come out? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: ratu...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:40:05 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 20 2007 9:40 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:42:50 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 20 2007 9:42 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:54:37 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 27 2007 4:54 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
....so someone has been nibbling for the last few days...the question
is who and why? If the "why" is just a wild stab in the dark, then we don't really care......it is not enough money to be material just yet You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: sginvestme...@aol.com
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:44:16 -0700
Local: Mon, Aug 27 2007 6:44 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
I hear that they are working on some big names and I see they're doing
some tests some kind of advertising as you can see on this link. If you watch the video you will see the ads on the screen within minutes! http://www.gofish.com/player.gfp?gfid=30-1124063 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:03:23 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 10:03 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
sginvestme...@aol.com wrote: I reviewed the ad prototype and I am not impressed with it. If they > I hear that they are working on some big names and I see they're doing > some tests some kind of advertising as you can see on this link. If > you watch the video you will see the ads on the screen within > minutes! http://www.gofish.com/player.gfp?gfid=30-1124063 wanted something effective, they should look at the type of noxious interference that appears on ESPN.com. Regardless, someone is still nibbling...... You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: sginvestme...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:38:08 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 10:38 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
GoFish Partners With adap.tv to Deliver Integrated Online Video Ads
Wednesday August 29, 8:30 am ET adap.tv to Insert Contextually Relevant Ads Into Online Video on the GoFish Network SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--GoFish Corporation (OTCBB:GOFH - Last week online video site YouTube announced the introduction of semi- "The monetization of video content has been one of the biggest "We are pleased to be partnering with GoFish, as they are the leading About GoFish Corporation GoFish Corporation, (OTCBB:GOFH - News) headquartered in San About adap.tv adap.tv is the leading in-video advertising network that delivers the Contact: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: sginvestme...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:59:14 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 10:59 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
eMarketer expects the market for online video advertising to smash the
$1 billion barrier by next year. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: sginvestme...@aol.com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:52:19 -0700
Local: Wed, Aug 29 2007 4:52 pm
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: chicagofina...@yahoo.com
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 06:47:07 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 30 2007 9:47 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: sginvestme...@aol.com
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:57:10 -0700
Local: Thurs, Aug 30 2007 10:57 am
Subject: Re: Down 95% from February: Bankruptcy or takeover?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - GOFH 2Q financials: bad news gets worse | GOFH analysis after recent drop - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2010 Google