<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>Gofish Corporation Google Group</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774</link>
  <description>Google Finance Discussion for Gofish Corporation (OTC:GOFH)</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>OK</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/2ce13a8b54f13fe9/f4deca9d05bbeaab?show_docid=f4deca9d05bbeaab</link>
  <description>
  Well, it appears that you guys will actually exist as of 12/31/09, so &lt;br&gt; for that I give you a hearty round of applause. That said, you must &lt;br&gt; be kicking yourselves every day of the week that you cannot manage to &lt;br&gt; generate any serious revenue with your bloated cost structure. You &lt;br&gt; need to pull out a $5-8M 3Q09 top line. It needs to be followed-up
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/2ce13a8b54f13fe9/f4deca9d05bbeaab?show_docid=f4deca9d05bbeaab</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  (Hunter)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:17:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Should BWAV Acquire SSVE? What do you guys think?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/bb14e25af6c04dba/72bf64e1b0943504?show_docid=72bf64e1b0943504</link>
  <description>
  it might make sense for BWAV to own SSVE as it will reduce costs for &lt;br&gt; customer service, technical support and back-office work with its &lt;br&gt; centers in the Philippines. I bought a few shares of SSVE just in &lt;br&gt; case, it seems very undervalued. What do you guys think about the &lt;br&gt; potential for a deal?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/bb14e25af6c04dba/72bf64e1b0943504?show_docid=72bf64e1b0943504</guid>
  <author>
  ndrwblai...@gmail.com
  (Andrew Blair)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:38:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 10-K 12/31/08</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/f7cbe8afc108cbf5/de5699b2b3ab2390?show_docid=de5699b2b3ab2390</link>
  <description>
  I have to show due credit for consistency in operational results. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Too bad that consistency is maintaining a $1 1/3M burn rate per month. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Well, we know how you appear through 3/31/09. We are half way to the &lt;br&gt; next report. Only you know whether another $2M in burn has occurred.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/f7cbe8afc108cbf5/de5699b2b3ab2390?show_docid=de5699b2b3ab2390</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:14:10 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>10-K 12/31/08</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/f7cbe8afc108cbf5/a5e2779eaa27333e?show_docid=a5e2779eaa27333e</link>
  <description>
  Honestly, as I stated previously, just the act of these guys existing &lt;br&gt; at the end of 2009 will be a triumph. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;That said, could these results possibly have been worse? Seriously, I &lt;br&gt; guess the original and even the revised business strategies were &lt;br&gt; duds. However, 2008 was essentially a complete waste. No traction at
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/f7cbe8afc108cbf5/a5e2779eaa27333e?show_docid=a5e2779eaa27333e</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:25:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Mother of All Dilutions</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/fc2567a743e242f7?show_docid=fc2567a743e242f7</link>
  <description>
  Interesting that Qatalyst worked on the deal......while I would chalk &lt;br&gt; that up to pathetic hubris or mere desperation on your part, it speaks &lt;br&gt; volumes that they passed on GOFH. The only issue here is that maybe &lt;br&gt; their terms were even more draconian that the cast of characters you &lt;br&gt; lined up for the $22.5M. I am tempted to qualifiy my prior tepid
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/fc2567a743e242f7?show_docid=fc2567a743e242f7</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 22:19:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The Mother of All Dilutions</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/aae19fdf6879667c?show_docid=aae19fdf6879667c</link>
  <description>
  Let&#39;s be clear here......fully diluted shares have now increased at &lt;br&gt; least 10X-12X...I can&#39;t be bothered to do the math, because it is &lt;br&gt; irrelevant anyway. So just to get this sucker to $1, you need to have &lt;br&gt; an enterprise value of $250M+......that would be quite a trick.....all &lt;br&gt; you need to know is that Google is getting smacked around badly, so
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/aae19fdf6879667c?show_docid=aae19fdf6879667c</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:11:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>The Mother of All Dilutions</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/73c3a7e8c22baf80?show_docid=73c3a7e8c22baf80</link>
  <description>
  But you know what? I&#39;ll take it. It beats going to $0.00 &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Well done guys. One caveat: Febreze, do us a favor and fade into the &lt;br&gt; background - OK? I don&#39;t care how much stock you own: #1 Freeman is &lt;br&gt; an actual person; #2 you are diluted to hell now; #3 it&#39;s your parents &lt;br&gt; money anyway......
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/78b51907b1f82be7/73c3a7e8c22baf80?show_docid=73c3a7e8c22baf80</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:55:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>8/14 release</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/baaad12c4b34b8c0/b8d49e6b676b77bf?show_docid=b8d49e6b676b77bf</link>
  <description>
  Reacting to this morning&#39;s release and based on something I posted 3 &lt;br&gt; months ago, it means that we can ignore this stuff. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Regardless, I am pleased with this Freeman guy. It is far better than &lt;br&gt; the prior guy who offered nothing in the way of a public presence, and &lt;br&gt; anything is better than the sweaty, nervous, in-need-of-diaper change
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/baaad12c4b34b8c0/b8d49e6b676b77bf?show_docid=b8d49e6b676b77bf</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:29:11 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>New Guy</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/fe2e899d9e20d029/141a46fc85f89fad?show_docid=141a46fc85f89fad</link>
  <description>
  I am actually impressed by this new guy. Anyhting to get rid of &lt;br&gt; Febreze as the public mouthpiece...... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Godpseed to the new guy............
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/fe2e899d9e20d029/141a46fc85f89fad?show_docid=141a46fc85f89fad</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:42:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: GOFISH Reports 10Q after market close Revenue is up and Projected revenue is good</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/dad5a44b45a63ddd/fdb3c9fa83548508?show_docid=fdb3c9fa83548508</link>
  <description>
  I apologize for being blunt, but you sound rather naive and clueless. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;The $657,000 revenue is shocking in its limited size. However, in the &lt;br&gt; filing Febreze et al. have laid out a path to a ramp up in the &lt;br&gt; magnitude of this metric over the course of 2008. There is also a &lt;br&gt; clear explanation as to why the numbers are what they are (i.e.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/dad5a44b45a63ddd/fdb3c9fa83548508?show_docid=fdb3c9fa83548508</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:24:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>GOFISH Reports 10Q after market close Revenue is up and Projected revenue is good</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/dad5a44b45a63ddd/7fe25cff36165a8f?show_docid=7fe25cff36165a8f</link>
  <description>
  Guys check the 10Q very interesting, we should see some movement &lt;br&gt; tomorrow. &lt;br&gt; The revenue is up to 657,000 from 24,000 last year. Thats good news I &lt;br&gt; guess &lt;br&gt; Projected revenue for the year is in the range of 8 to 11 million &lt;br&gt; Any comments.?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/dad5a44b45a63ddd/7fe25cff36165a8f?show_docid=7fe25cff36165a8f</guid>
  <author>
  ama...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:52:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 10-KSB</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/99da061b51702c4a?show_docid=99da061b51702c4a</link>
  <description>
  Can you say, life support? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;I warned the board last year that the economics are bad -- GOFH is &lt;br&gt; plowing through money like there is no tomorrow - and the marginal &lt;br&gt; increase in revenues does not come close to compensating for the large &lt;br&gt; increase in expenditures. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Last year around this time they got $10 million in private financing.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/99da061b51702c4a?show_docid=99da061b51702c4a</guid>
  <author>
  ratu...@gmail.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:49:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 10-KSB</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/29746a78131b789c?show_docid=29746a78131b789c</link>
  <description>
  I fully endorse the incentives and protections accorded the investors &lt;br&gt; in this move. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Expensive money for the company, but if you guys manage to pull this &lt;br&gt; out, or else sell yourselves out, you deserve the coin. &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;You are making the strongest personal endorsement of this company &lt;br&gt; possible, and as a shareholder, I appreciate this public display.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/29746a78131b789c?show_docid=29746a78131b789c</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:15:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: 10-KSB</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/2849f4e351659646?show_docid=2849f4e351659646</link>
  <description>
  Am I this good, or was I just stating the obvious in past posts? &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://biz.yahoo.com/e/080421/gofh.ob8-k.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/0c1ef578fb0fcef4/2849f4e351659646?show_docid=2849f4e351659646</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:05:51 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Let&#39;s try and figure out Febreze&#39;s double talk</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/14d0161ea872582c/41b613354dd2d39c?show_docid=41b613354dd2d39c</link>
  <description>
  could be worse..... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;April 17th, 2008 at 4:17 pm &lt;br&gt; BREAKING NEWS: &lt;br&gt; Google’s net surged 30% to $1.31 billion as sales, excluding &lt;br&gt; commissions paid to partners, jumped 46% to $3.7 billion. Shares &lt;br&gt; pushed past $500 in after-hours trading.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.711774/browse_thread/thread/14d0161ea872582c/41b613354dd2d39c?show_docid=41b613354dd2d39c</guid>
  <author>
  chicagofina...@yahoo.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:17:59 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
