Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
   
Discussions for Gofish Corporation View all discussions
My starred discussions
My profile

Message from discussion GOFH analysis after recent drop
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
sean...@gmail.com  
View profile  
 More options Jul 9 2007, 11:31 am
From: sean...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 08:31:16 -0700
Local: Mon, Jul 9 2007 11:31 am
Subject: Re: GOFH analysis after recent drop
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Report this message | Find messages by this author
what is going on with this company? first they need to fix up their
website. Why is it running soo slow compare to other video content
websites??? they should fix up their website with all the money they
are spending. Also, it says that they've spent some money on
advertising.. where????? START ADVERTISING!
chicagofina...@yahoo.com wrote:
> chicagofina...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > ratu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > value of GOFH shares at about $3.75 each.  And that doesn't even
> > > include the value of bolt.com that GOFH recently acquired.

> > The Bolt acquisition has not closed yet, only the deal was announced.
> > I have yet to see consolidated results.

> Well....we have a closed transaction, so I will expect consolidated
> results.  I assume these guys are going to follow the standard QSB
> timeline a file their 6/30 at or near 8/15.  I did notice that they
> properly avoided making public news releases during the period that
> would be construed as a "blackout" around this announcement.

> Maybe their financials are crap, but they certainly are trying to look
> like they are playing by the rules.  I give them credit for doing the
> basics correctly here [or at least their lawyers].

> We are watching.......step it up!  Being public cuts both ways....so
> produce, and now!


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google