|
|
| Discussions for Melco PBL Entertainment (Macau) Limited | View all discussions |
|
| THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL | ||
| Messages 1 - 25 of 48 in discussion - Newer » | ||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:30:54 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 8:30 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Morning, again. I just read a few very interesting articles. The
problem is not MPEL - cash flow or planning - but, rather, a lack / need of "qualified" contractors, specifically as it applies to interior construction and design. Carpenters, electricians, painters, etc. are in huge demand and stretched incredibly thin. Furthermore, the help that the qualified contractors employ are unreliable at best. There are a tremendous amount of "no shows". There is also a huge learning curve / problem with "training on the job". It's my understanding that we'll see yet another "soft" opening "around" April 28th, with full completion of the casino / hotel projected for Q4 2007. Not a contractor but having supervised contracting budgets over the As if these issues were not enough, researching further, it's Keep in mind too that Beijing is in "mad" preparation mode for the Hence, I remain stark in my present day assestment that MPEL (and Bottomline - I would be more concerned if MPEL was misappropriating Competition is a "good thing", and MPEL is an outstanding position to Here's to a great week! You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: "Ash" <ashokkut...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:11:28 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 9:11 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Street does not look to theories and potential returns. The opening of
Crown Macau is already priced into MPEL's stock. If they announce a delay in opening of Crown, the stock will get hammered down. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 06:44:17 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 9:44 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Morning. I respectfully disagree. I'm not sure that the complete
opening and short-term revenues from Mocha are factored in. If it was, I would say by my personal estimation that this should be a 22-25 stock. I believe that once it gets to that level, then such is factored. I also believe that in the "smarts" of The Street. I think that there is a difference in a "delay" and a "delay by business". No one should doubt the shortage of labor. However, as with all things, money is a powerful motivator, and I am not personally worried, as I believe that Ho/Packer would pay overruns / do what it takes to open on time if it will. I note that there is no "official" announcement of an opening, and the April 28 date to my knowledge is speculation / mention. I would not think that an opening in the same quarter damages the stock value, certainly not long-term. "Hammer" is a very strong word, and I think the 17's are the worse of it, short of unsystematic risk changes. At least in our speculation, we are discussing here "systematic" risk, and the results are more predictible. I think we'll begin to get a very good idea of news beginning next week. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: avidd...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:20:20 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:20 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Take Jennifer's post with a grain of salt. She is a bitter weak hand.
Please refer to her posts on the YAHOO MPEL BOARD to see what you are dealing with. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: avidd...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:31:28 -0000
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:31 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Some links to Jennifer's MPEL POSTS FROM YAHOO"
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/thread... http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/thread... Too many bashing posts to put them all here but check out when she http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_M/thread... Enough Said....Close this Thread You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:33:02 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:33 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Hi. I have read them. I think though that it is good to always get a
perspective different than yours, regardless of source. For me personally, it pushes me to conduct more in-depth research and question my positions. I would be wrong to say that I too do not have frustration here. Then You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: avidd...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:37:18 -0000
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:37 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Of course, I have no problem with people posting contrarian views,
that is what these boards are for. But her bias and venom is so obvious. I just hope she doesn't poison this board like she has the Yahoo board. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:41:27 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:41 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
No, I wasn't implying anything that you were. And, I agree. It's
good to be objective here, and "poison" is most unwelcome. Curious what Wynn will do tomorrow as well as how MGM-Ho will go. Perhaps why the sector as a whole is down today? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:45:42 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 10:45 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
WARNING
To my fellow google board members. Be very aware of this JENNIFER.SHEN whatever character. She is all over the yahoo board and basically pumps and then dumps the stock. She is basically a short term trader that has no loyalty. The worst of the kind. I can respect bears and shorts with convictions but she is the worst parasite possible. If she owns MPEL she will talk it like the most passionate long but as soon as she unloads she will bash it in hopes of getting in again at lower price. On yahoo board she talking about getting in at 16...last time she got on at low 17's i believe. Be careful of any information that disseminates as she is a low life of no comparison. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: johns...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:53:12 -0000
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 6:53 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Under the deal, the joint venture between PBL and Lawrence Ho's Melco
will receive a percentage of gross gaming revenue from Mr Friedman, the former chief counsel for Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas Sands group. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: clem...@sacbeemail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:39:46 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 11:39 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
A friend of mine who works for Progressive Gaming International has
flown to Macau a lot the last few months said the Crown was done (at least from the casino view) and is flying back this summer to do installs for LVS. He said most of the management positions were being trained in Peth at The City of Dreams is a different story...they are passed grading and The good news is the Crown has it's own travel companies to help It's a good place to get in if your looking...once the Crown is open I see MelcoPBL as a long term investment not a quick trade. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:45:23 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 11:45 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Very nicely said, as always. Insight always appreciated. The City
delay does "worry" me a bit, but, as one who has been associated with these projects, things have a tendency of gaining momentum once they get moving. Let's wait and see...here's to 22 - 25 sooner than later. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 08:54:15 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 11:54 am
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Thank you Clem. Good insight! Let's hope for a strong Crown execution.
It can sure change everything about this stock. KNKG you referred to a sale of a sub-concession to LVS? What is all about and how is it gonna affect MPEL?Thanks You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: knkglo...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:01:39 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:01 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Hi. Not to LVS but another casino that escapes me. Stock here is
down today, but the "good" news is so is everyone else. In addition to a higher moving daily average, I'd love to see this stock start tracking a mirror of LVS and WYNN. That seems to be the case today at least. Perhaps again in anticipation of tomorrow. Let's see what happens. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:09:29 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:09 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Hi,
The yahoo postings reflect frustration because I was being bashed My basic viewpoint is that this stock has a great future but that the Basically, Credit Suisse forecasts about 500-600M earnings. in 2009. With those earnings you get about 1.49 per ADR, and with a PE of 20, a What would I pay for a stock which might be 30 in 2009 today? Well Maybe 20. But given additional risks, including construction That is my view. Not poisonous, nor venomous. :) You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:21:39 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:21 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
You are lying. I have read your posts on Yahoo saying that you bought
at 17 and dumped at 18. You are telling everyone there to get out before it goes to 16 tomorrow. Don't you be fooling anyone here. You are a typical pump and dump trying to get in this board and spread your lies. Other people on this board are very familiar with you. Just stay over at yahoo. I don't mind shorts, but people like you are the worst. You change your view on the stock depending on if you own it or you just sold it and want to get back in at lower prices. MPEL fundamentals don't change that fast. I am a long and have been reloading on this all the way down and plan on doing some more. You have no credibility or integrity so take your game somewhere else. Do not poison this board with your deceit. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:26:47 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:26 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
okay
I guess you're saying that my points in the message above are all You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:34:09 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
It is not the message my dear...it is the messenger....you have no
credibility and validity...It is like the boy that cried wolf. We can all find and read those MSG independent from you. It is you motives that are deceitful and despicable. You are trying to feed off of people's fear for your own gain. I will make sure that me and my fellow bloggers here will expose you and your motives whenever you come on. This board is reclaimed and policed by decent people...short or long. Take a position and stick with it unless the Company changes....or your vision does. You are something else. Pump and dump all day long. You contribute nothing and try to take everything. You are a Parasite and I am sure that is not the first time you have been called that or names similar. Good luck to you not only with your stocks but in life. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:42:36 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:42 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
aren't you nice. judge jury and executioner you are. but you've got
the wrong gal. now leave me alone and kindly respond to the logic in my post above. Do you disagree w/ Credit Suisse estimates? My PE? Me risks for discounting? This is an MPEL discussion board and not a place for you and I to chat You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:57:43 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 12:57 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
S&P bullinsh on Macau:
The company has indicated confidence in growth prospects from Macau, You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:07:02 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 1:07 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
looks like you can't respond directly to my points. no sense in
holding a logical conversation then now is there? at least tell me if you disagree with not so hot Credit Suisse Your post above is less specific than mine, when it talks about MPEL. The MPEL picture is good, but not flawless. And at 18 bucks, the You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:17:40 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 1:17 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
To quote the venerable Stanley Ho:::when water rises all boats will be
lifted. MPEL is long term play for me....the story makes sense to me. This is You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:22:53 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 1:22 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
seems to me you are gambling. How can you buy a stock if you can't
even have a sense of the revenue forecast? Credit Suisse has done a very rigorous one, and I'm sorry, but their You are a speculator and you don't know what you just got into. Please, don't tell me to get a life. I'm doing you a favor. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: abjd4...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:27:04 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
So what is burning you. Then don't buy it and move on to another
stock. You don't have a position. That would be doing us a favor. Please don't buy!...lol! Thanks for your DD...lol! You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: jennifer.schen...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:31:07 -0800
Local: Mon, Feb 26 2007 1:31 pm
Subject: Re: THIS NEWS FROM AUSTRALIA DOES NOT LOOK TOO GREAT FOR MPEL
Let me give you an answer, for the benefit of others.
Nothing burns me. I am providing information. This stock is Since my buy price is below what you paid, you don't want me here. MPEL is overhyped and people got hurt. I am telling the truth here. Like everything, there is a good price. That price might be 16 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| Messages 1 - 25 of 48 Newer » |
| « Newer discussion - Response from IP of MPEL 2/26/07 | worried about WYNN earnings impact on MPEL - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2010 Google