|
|
| Discussions for Fuqi International, Inc. | View all discussions |
|
| Anyone follow this who isn't spamming? | ||
| All 5 messages in discussion - | ||
From: Khalsa007 <inderpreet.ba...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 06:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 21 2009 9:46 am
Subject: Anyone follow this who isn't spamming?
Why the drop from the $29 level? I want to get in..this stock has
alot of potential but can't find any news to the $4 swing in price from its highs.. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: ExitOnBir <exiton...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Aug 21 2009 4:46 pm
Subject: Re: Anyone follow this who isn't spamming?
I ask the same question and there is nothing out there. Most likely a
profit sell-off. This stock showed the same pattern all the way from single digits to $29. It climbs up big time (20-50%) in a week, retreats half of the climb plays around a little bit and shoots up even higher than before. I think some institutions are buying it gradually. Not sure if there is a reason behind it other than its' extreme volatility, which is skewed upwards-at least so far. Based on the $29 mark -in my humble opinion- any buy between $21-24 is a good buy. I got in @24.60. On Aug 21, 9:46 am, Khalsa007 <inderpreet.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Sergio <subliminal1...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Sep 1 2009 5:10 pm
Subject: Re: Anyone follow this who isn't spamming?
I agree. I think this month is a good time to get in on FUQI. I'm
holding this one long term. I got in at 14, then some at 16, and most around 17. There will be a SHARP pullback in my opinion but if you stick it out and get in in the low 20s, then afterwards I'm seeing a steep increase easily surpassing 30 by the end of the year. Solid company with solid fundamentals. On Aug 21, 4:46 pm, ExitOnBir <exiton...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Tyler <tylerkmhart...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 6 2009 8:40 pm
Subject: Re: Anyone follow this who isn't spamming?
I have followed this stock since the ipo and have bought it several
times (not recently). I think this is a fantastic company that is still undervalued. I have sold 2/3 of my shares to balance my portfolio, but am holding the rest for the foreseeable future. I like the company more, obviously when it was trading at less than WC/ share. I find HQS and CMTP very cheep spec stocks here that should have very little downside risk do to their ridiculously low price. On Sep 1, 5:10 pm, Sergio <subliminal1...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Maine_Guy <jason.huck...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, Sep 11 2009 9:17 am
Subject: Re: Anyone follow this who isn't spamming?
Up large in pre-market.. wonder what the rush is?
On Sep 6, 8:40 pm, Tyler <tylerkmhart...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - SPAM | Dilution - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2010 Google