> Also, in the news right now, China may start to allow the Chinese
> yuan
> to rise in value. This would also cause FUQI stock price to rise, am
> I
> correct?

> On Oct 1, 5:21 pm, ZachZaw <zzawar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I made a quick gain on FUQI, but I'm glad I got out before today.  In
> > at $28, out at $30.  I might get back into FUQI soon, maybe on Monday
> > if it hits $26.  What do you think will happen to this stock if it
> > closes below its 50-day moving average?  Wouldn't that cause more
> > selling and take it down to $24?  I like the FUQI fundamentals, I'm
> > just wondering how the technicals affect this thing.

> >http://www.ShootTheBears.com

> > On Sep 30, 8:58 am, jackson <j.foley...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Oppenheimer launches with Outperform a few days ago, and now Cowen and
> > > Company reiterates Outperform. I am thinking the time of consolidating
> > > a base - and flushing out those happy to take their short term gains -
> > > is wrapping up.  The period of marching up again toward a value that
> > > is closer to the Price Earnings & Growth dynamics might well be
> > > getting underway again. Certainly it will be in 6 weeks - when the big
> > > Positve earnings surprise that is their norm moves it to the next
> > > level.- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> First Call consensus analyst estimates updated Q4 09 estimate is .57
> It sits right next to Q3 09 of .73.   Historical: 2008 Q3 .31 and Q4 .
> 45  or +50%.  Q3 to Q4 2007 went .21 to .39 – a 90% increase.  But
> this year it will go down 20%?!  No, up 20% would be .87 a layup - and
> yields $2.50 for year as I mentioned.  This thing goes off like a
> rocket when Q4 and 2009 year get released.

> Also, look at how the PE drops with the big new earnings. Fidelity was
> showing PE in the 12s yesterday…today it has updated the 12 month
> earnings - dropped Q3 08 and added Q3 09 - and it says P/E 9.67.

> When FUQI does .95 in Q4 [or more] and drops a .45 from q4 2008 – the
> PE will plummet again – looking super-undervalued indeed!  That would
> be what a 7 PE at today's pps!

> On Nov 11, 11:46 am, Craig Moore <toughb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > WELL SAID!  Glad to hear someone is as long as I am ,   other than the
> > owners!!  I am in with 5 digits as well.   They do need to learn to
> > communicate better though,   I listened to the call and they sounded
> > like third graders trying to explain the whole ODM thing.  I mean,  it
> > should be a good thing that a new,  very profitable business unit is
> > developing and could contribute 1.00 per share in EPS, but they made
> > it sound like some random occurence.  I hate how conservative they are
> > as well.  .50 in Q4!!! Bull**it!!   .80 or better.....

> > On Nov 11, 7:59 am, jackson <j.foley...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > > Q4 2009 will beat FUQI guidance by 50% or more.  Growing share - in a
> > > growth sector - in a growth country. It is their Investor Relations
> > > that holds them back. They underguide by 50% - and confuse people.
> > > Said q2 would be 32 cents early in August before secondary...3 wks
> > > later it was 45 cents.  Reprting q2, said q3 will be 43 cents.  Uh,
> > > no, it wasn't headed down - it was headed to 73 cents!

> > > Now they say it is headed down again: 55-60 cents in q4.  Uhhh...no
> > > again. FUQI went up almost 50% q3 to q4 last year - and will go up
> > > again...up from 73 cents of q3.

> > > So, here is the real, and a little conservative, math: 45 +45 + 73 +
> > > Q4 of just $.87 = $2.50  - a tremendous 2009 eps.  The 87 cents
> > > assumes a mere 20% increase going from the weakest qtr to the
> > > strongest [no jewelry holidays to 3 jewelry holidays]  $2.50 is more
> > > than the 2011 estimates [which Cramer was referred to yesterday "only
> > > 8x 2011 earnings.  It is here this year!  Oppenheimer called for $2.01
> > > in 2010 and saw that as generating a price per share of $38.

> > > Hey, my real guesstimate is 98 cents in Q4!.  Their absurdly way-too-
> > > conservative guidance will begin to be seen as meaningless [or they
> > > will learn not to do it] but either way the obvious reality will be
> > > known. FUQI is on one of the fastest growing sustainable growth paths
> > > on the planet. Look at past 5 years and project their opportunity in
> > > the next five years. Growing market share - in a fast growing sector -
> > > in the fast growing middle and upper classes - in a fast growing
> > > country.

> > > FUQI doesn't know how to communicate with the Street [yet] - but they
> > > sure as hell know how to make money!!  The stock will be in the upper
> > > 30s after q4 and 2009 is reported...and heading to $50.  Seriously.  I
> > > have 5 digit share holdings to prove how much I believe that - and
> > > they remain in the vault - for years to come.

> > > Final point. Do NOT get sucked out by hedge fund thieves and Short
> > > selling manipulators here at the bottom.  There are only 16 or 17
> > > million outsider shares - the owner has never sold one as best I can
> > > tell.  14 million were sold in last 2 days!!!  I don't know how that
> > > is possible...it is amazing it held up as well as it did...but they
> > > have to be running low on ammo!  These folks can crush it short term -
> > > [should be illegal] but not long term.  So, relax. and patiently await
> > > your well deserved gains. That is my amateur but well researched POV.- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> On Nov 11, 7:59 am, jackson <j.foley...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Q4 2009 will beat FUQI guidance by 50% or more.  Growing share - in a
> > growth sector - in a growth country. It is their Investor Relations
> > that holds them back. They underguide by 50% - and confuse people.
> > Said q2 would be 32 cents early in August before secondary...3 wks
> > later it was 45 cents.  Reprting q2, said q3 will be 43 cents.  Uh,
> > no, it wasn't headed down - it was headed to 73 cents!

> > Now they say it is headed down again: 55-60 cents in q4.  Uhhh...no
> > again. FUQI went up almost 50% q3 to q4 last year - and will go up
> > again...up from 73 cents of q3.

> > So, here is the real, and a little conservative, math: 45 +45 + 73 +
> > Q4 of just $.87 = $2.50  - a tremendous 2009 eps.  The 87 cents
> > assumes a mere 20% increase going from the weakest qtr to the
> > strongest [no jewelry holidays to 3 jewelry holidays]  $2.50 is more
> > than the 2011 estimates [which Cramer was referred to yesterday "only
> > 8x 2011 earnings.  It is here this year!  Oppenheimer called for $2.01
> > in 2010 and saw that as generating a price per share of $38.

> > Hey, my real guesstimate is 98 cents in Q4!.  Their absurdly way-too-
> > conservative guidance will begin to be seen as meaningless [or they
> > will learn not to do it] but either way the obvious reality will be
> > known. FUQI is on one of the fastest growing sustainable growth paths
> > on the planet. Look at past 5 years and project their opportunity in
> > the next five years. Growing market share - in a fast growing sector -
> > in the fast growing middle and upper classes - in a fast growing
> > country.

> > FUQI doesn't know how to communicate with the Street [yet] - but they
> > sure as hell know how to make money!!  The stock will be in the upper
> > 30s after q4 and 2009 is reported...and heading to $50.  Seriously.  I
> > have 5 digit share holdings to prove how much I believe that - and
> > they remain in the vault - for years to come.

> > Final point. Do NOT get sucked out by hedge fund thieves and Short
> > selling manipulators here at the bottom.  There are only 16 or 17
> > million outsider shares - the owner has never sold one as best I can
> > tell.  14 million were sold in last 2 days!!!  I don't know how that
> > is possible...it is amazing it held up as well as it did...but they
> > have to be running low on ammo!  These folks can crush it short term -
> > [should be illegal] but not long term.  So, relax. and patiently await
> > your well deserved gains. That is my amateur but well researched POV.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -

> Now they say it is headed down again: 55-60 cents in q4.  Uhhh...no
> again. FUQI went up almost 50% q3 to q4 last year - and will go up
> again...up from 73 cents of q3.

> So, here is the real, and a little conservative, math: 45 +45 + 73 +
> Q4 of just $.87 = $2.50  - a tremendous 2009 eps.  The 87 cents
> assumes a mere 20% increase going from the weakest qtr to the
> strongest [no jewelry holidays to 3 jewelry holidays]  $2.50 is more
> than the 2011 estimates [which Cramer was referred to yesterday "only
> 8x 2011 earnings.  It is here this year!  Oppenheimer called for $2.01
> in 2010 and saw that as generating a price per share of $38.

> Hey, my real guesstimate is 98 cents in Q4!.  Their absurdly way-too-
> conservative guidance will begin to be seen as meaningless [or they
> will learn not to do it] but either way the obvious reality will be
> known. FUQI is on one of the fastest growing sustainable growth paths
> on the planet. Look at past 5 years and project their opportunity in
> the next five years. Growing market share - in a fast growing sector -
> in the fast growing middle and upper classes - in a fast growing
> country.

> FUQI doesn't know how to communicate with the Street [yet] - but they
> sure as hell know how to make money!!  The stock will be in the upper
> 30s after q4 and 2009 is reported...and heading to $50.  Seriously.  I
> have 5 digit share holdings to prove how much I believe that - and
> they remain in the vault - for years to come.

> Final point. Do NOT get sucked out by hedge fund thieves and Short
> selling manipulators here at the bottom.  There are only 16 or 17
> million outsider shares - the owner has never sold one as best I can
> tell.  14 million were sold in last 2 days!!!  I don't know how that
> is possible...it is amazing it held up as well as it did...but they
> have to be running low on ammo!  These folks can crush it short term -
> [should be illegal] but not long term.  So, relax. and patiently await
> your well deserved gains. That is my amateur but well researched POV.