discussions| Messages 1 - 15 of 20 Older » |
 |
Re: Still bouncing off support |
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: scubadog...@msn.com
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:41:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Jan 3 2009 11:41 am
Subject: Re: Still bouncing off support
So what do u think of this stock? The Chinese economy (especailly
financial markets) is on an upswing. I just wonder about this stock. Seems like it could a potentially great investment, given P/E and the desire of Chinese education to expand. Any thoughts?? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Still bouncing off support |
|
From: baskin.j...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 20:30:02 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Dec 4 2008 11:30 pm
Subject: Still bouncing off support
Shares of CEDU continue to bounce off support and hold above its 50
day moving average. The MACD is still in a strong bullish trend as well. Shares should be purchased into this weakness with a minimum price target of $5.15 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Bouncing off support |
|
From: baskin.j...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 19:18:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Dec 2 2008 10:18 pm
Subject: Bouncing off support
Shares of CEDU bounced off its 13 day moving average today to close
down by less than 1%. Downside volume continues to be very orderly and the technical condition of the stock remains constructive. Shares should be accumulated into this pullback with a price objective of around $5.00. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Good time to get in? |
|
From: jon...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Aug 27 2008 12:22 am
Subject: Re: Good time to get in?
I agree, this stock'e IPO was pathetic. I got in at 3 sold at 4, made
some quick cash but for a long term position wait for a while, there;s just no actio going on in the volume You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Good time to get in? |
|
From: september <lloy...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 31 2008 3:49 am
Subject: Re: Good time to get in?
The thing I don't like about this stock is the anemic trading volume.
I sold at about $6.50, and won't be getting back in at least until I
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Good time to get in? |
|
From: DJVJ <vaibhavjai...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 06:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 27 2008 9:47 am
Subject: Good time to get in?
Guys,
This stock looks very cheap right now for a long term position. What do you suggest? Should I get in right now or wait for it to go below $3? Thanks Djvj You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Is this a good investment idea? |
|
From: jaylif...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:28:15 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Dec 15 2007 3:28 am
Subject: Re: Is this a good investment idea?
CEDU does not offer online degrees. It enable existing credited
universities, some are in the A-list in China, to offer degree programs online. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Is this a good investment idea? |
|
From: yzz1...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Local: Fri, Dec 14 2007 1:09 pm
Subject: Re: Is this a good investment idea?
NED should be a lot better than CEDU. Comparing to CEDU, NED is much
cheaper than CEDU. CEDU should be arroud $5 based on PE and EPS. $0.06 is too less. While NED EPS is $0.37. Also most important is the business model. Online degree does not have same value as university or college. NED is dealing with students from elementary to high school. It has wider coverage and should have better business. So If anyone wants investe in the education sector, it is better go for NED and EDU. They both have good fundment. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
|
Re: Is this a good investment idea? |
|
From: Euroalb1...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Dec 12 2007 9:00 am
Subject: Re: Is this a good investment idea?
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||
| Messages 1 - 15 of 20 Older » |