Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
   
Discussions for Gushan Environmental Energy Limited View all discussions
My starred discussions
My profile

  Gushan tax dispute
All 2 messages in discussion  - 
Reporting discussion
Messages reported
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Wolf  
View profile  
 More options Jun 13, 10:48 am
From: Wolf <ccspagn...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jun 13 2009 10:48 am
Subject: Gushan tax dispute
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Report this message | Find messages by this author
The reporting on this issue has been sparse, but here's a piece I dug
up in the original reports that may be of interest (I tracked this
down after allusions in other discussions to the fact that the dispute
was taken directly to China's central government)...

"Gushan expressed its view to the State Administration of Taxation of
Fujian Province ("Fujian SAT") that its biodiesel, which is produced
from used cooking oil, vegetable oil offal and jatropha oil, should
not be subject to such consumption tax. Gushan was subsequently
informed that Fujian SAT and the Fujian Municipal Finance Bureau
jointly issued a written proposal to the PRC State Administration of
Taxation ("PRC SAT") requesting that biodiesel products without
petroleum-based diesel content be specifically excluded from paying
consumption tax. As of the date of this announcement, the PRC SAT has
not yet replied to this proposal."

I wasn't aware that even the local taxing authority was in favor of
the exemption.  That's hopeful news - I had been under the impression
that Gushan and the Fujian province government were squaring off over
this.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
wodi  
View profile  
 More options Jun 13, 2:00 pm
From: wodi <cctv7187497...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jun 13 2009 2:00 pm
Subject: Re: Gushan tax dispute
Reply to author | Forward | Print | Individual message | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Agreed. Local government certainly supports the local company who will
bring more jobs and revenue in the long run. GUSHAN may also spread
all over China as the leader in the field.

On Jun 13, 10:48 am, Wolf <ccspagn...@hotmail.com> wrote:


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

End of messages  

« Newer discussion  -  Gu is a good buy right now this thing is going to $5 in the next 2 month   GU WILL double in the next 2 month MARK my words I am never wrong.  -  Older discussion »




Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2009 Google