|
|
| Discussions for DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE INDEX | View all discussions |
|
| Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose | ||
| Email updates to me | ||
| All 10 messages in discussion - | ||
From: Credo <credo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 10:31 pm
Subject: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
Conservative grass-roots activists asserted Wednesday that third-party
candidate Doug Hoffman’s loss in a New York special election was no setback but, rather, signaled a victory for the burgeoning political movement. “I think time was the biggest factor, and if [Hoffman had] had a bit
Janet Spencer, a South Carolina-based tea party activist who in
-------------------
Humorous post that got censored by a Google conservative employee
Obviously, conservatives lost, as did Palin, tea baggers and the
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Credo <credo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29161.html
On Nov 4, 9:31 pm, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Mothermugger <ivan.of.the.oza...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:36:12 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 10:36 pm
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
Yes if your goal is kill the republican party they did a great job....
Who would believe that Google has conservative employees?!?
On Nov 4, 10:31 pm, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: tetch <tetchmagi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:21:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 12:21 am
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Credo <credo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 1:09 am
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
It's zero out of three for the conservative party. If you're
referring to right of center and excluding the house seat won in California, which I don't know why you would, then I guess you'd be right. On Nov 4, 11:21 pm, tetch <tetchmagi...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: David <cessna1...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 8:16 am
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
Hmmm....there's WonderDunce staring at the Alaskan pipeline watching
the majority of that Oil being shipped off to Japan at RECORD profits while in the lower 40 we pay more and more for imported Oil. We need to do MORE drilling in the USA so says fat cat Oil execs and Senators. Why?? Does Japan need more Oil that the Alaskan pipeline can supply them?? Great job Sarah!
On Nov 4, 11:02 pm, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: grump <grum...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 05:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 8:18 am
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
That's right, you guys won. Congrats. The fact that people voted not
only for the republican candidate for govenor in Virginia but then went on to vote the straight line repiblican party ticket for Lt. Govenor and Attorney General doesn't mean a thing. And even though Obama, ACORN and SEIU invested a lot of political capital in the NJ, a solidly blue state, race and ended up getting pounded doesn't mean anything either. Yep, you guys beat a complete unknown in NY who has never run for an elected office in his life. Good job. Only problem is the NY congressional seat was a special election and the seat will come up for vote again in 2010, but don't worry about that. You guys keep it up, you're doing a great job of whistling past the graveyard. On Nov 5, 1:09 am, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Googlymoogly <baysidegolfc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:25:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 9:25 am
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
Yes -- Entering the 3-way race with only a month to go and no backing,
then taking 44% of the split vote to lose by only 4% is a tragedy. We should never, ever fool ourselves into thinking that the guy never had a chance. Hmmmmm! On Nov 4, 10:31 pm, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: fahrquad <fahrq...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:34:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 12:34 pm
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
No, they didn't lose, they just didn't win. What's the difference?
They drummed out the moderate republican who might have had a chance against the democrat in favor of the conservative republican and lost. Apparently they still haven't learned their lesson. On Nov 4, 10:32 pm, Credo <credo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
From: Googlymoogly <baysidegolfc...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:05:09 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 5 2009 2:05 pm
Subject: Re: Conservatives on NY-23: We didn't lose
The lesson is -- Don't nominate false Republicans. This lady was
more liberal than the Democrat. The only problem the Republicans have is that they have soured their base by allowing way too much Liberal/ Socialist programming go unchecked. Lesson learned - Off to the races. You can have all the liberal voters you want or think you can get. The rest want nothing to do with Obama/Pelosi Social engineering. The base they had is coming out of their fog...... On Nov 5, 12:34 pm, fahrquad <fahrq...@gmail.com> wrote:
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| End of messages |
| « Newer discussion - Many experience Senior citizens heard about GOA and saying U.S stockmarket & America is going massive great depression ! | And Now "The Real Story"... - Older discussion » |
| Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
©2009 Google