Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Go to Google Groups Home
  
Discussions for DOW JONES INDUSTRIAL AVERAGE INDEX View all discussions

Message from discussion A Republican's duty
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Leo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2009, 6:38 pm
From: Leo <paru...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:38:23 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 4 2009 6:38 pm
Subject: Re: A Republican's duty

So ... breaking the rules to protect the rules? Cool!

On Nov 4, 2:04 pm, tetch <tetchmagi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Had to share this story.  A buddy went to vote yesterday & was told he
> couldn't because he was no longer a resident (recently moved).  So he
> called his new county who informed him registration had ended before
> he was a resident there.  As a result he was not allowed to vote in
> either county.

> So he makes a stink with the people around there (things like "I'm
> being disenfrancihsed" and "denying my sufferage") until at some point
> after speaking to various officials the county attorney, who I guess
> happened to be there, told him he could see the election judge about
> it.

> He walks with the attorney to the neighboring court house.  Shortly
> after the court finishes resolving some minor matter, and establishing
> that the judge was actually the election judge for the day (the clerk
> had to tell him), my friend explains the situation and ends with "And
> as a result, I can't vote.  And that's not good.".

> The judge agrees and issues an order allowing him to cast a ballot for
> that day.  My friend was quite happy to go back to the ladies tending
> the polls (who initially cackled at his situation) and arrive at the
> precise time that they were called and told to allow him to vote.

> The conclusion:  he voted no on two municipal items that would cause
> increases in taxes in a county that he was no longer a resident.  In
> my humble opinion, the duty of any good Republican.


    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy

©2010 Google