<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>The American Red Cross Google Group</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.9858371</link>
  <description>Google Finance Discussion for The American Red Cross</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>I want to buy some stock in Red Cross</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.9858371/browse_thread/thread/541fc2d1d91a50ca/c301d9beb4314c5a?show_docid=c301d9beb4314c5a</link>
  <description>
  But I found my local brokerage firm doesn&#39;t list it. It has a &lt;br&gt; capitalization of a few billions and I believe ite has great &lt;br&gt; potential, especially in the troubled times we experience today. So &lt;br&gt; how can I buy this stock?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.9858371/browse_thread/thread/541fc2d1d91a50ca</guid>
  <author>
  mvp1...@gmail.com
  (Mihai)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 06:47:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Is The Red Cross Effective?</title>
  <link>http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.9858371/browse_thread/thread/662d1e7dd769dcc6/78bbe6c895502f7e?show_docid=78bbe6c895502f7e</link>
  <description>
  I second the notion. We need a better rubric for evaluating nonprofit &lt;br&gt; effectiveness; we&#39;ll all get there faster if we collaborate on the &lt;br&gt; metrics we&#39;re using, instead of letting the powers-that-be regale us &lt;br&gt; with &amp;quot;admin overhead vs. program&amp;quot; and other favorite nursery rhymes. &lt;br&gt; For an organization as large as the Red Cross, this must be a
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.9858371/browse_thread/thread/662d1e7dd769dcc6</guid>
  <author>
  d...@digitalraindrop.com
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:06:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
