The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
From: mojo...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 10:04:42 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Dec 15 2007 1:04 pm
Subject: Re: Is The Red Cross Effective?
It's Maura yet again! I've been thinking about Sean's and Raindrop's
questions. Like I said, statistics are not my game. But even if they were... how would we compare the community impact of, say, a unit of blood, a person learning a lifesaving skill like CPR, a person sheltered in a disaster, a meal delivered to someone cleaning up after a disaster, etc.? And when it comes to efficiency, a meal served in a shelter setting is obviously going to cost less than a meal delivered on one of our trucks to a recovering neighborhood, so how do you compare? Some vital services are quick and easy to deliver; others are hard and expensive, but equally vital. Costs can also vary widely from year to year. And if you are comparing one charity with another... how do you compare, say, the impact of taking a school kid to the symphony with the impact of funding research, which perhaps fails, on some deadly disease? Our missions are all so different! You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||